Leaked Google Documents Prove Mass Censoring, Election Tampering
Published 1 week ago on August 15, 2019By Makia Freeman
AT A GLANCE…
- THE STORY:Google insider and whistleblower Zachary Vorhies has gone public with internal Google documents, proving how Google has engaged in censorship, election tampering & more.
- THE IMPLICATIONS:Will anyone believe that Google is a neutral platform anymore? Why is Google violating its own mission statement by making information inaccessible? Why is Google being an information gatekeeper & trying to impose its ideological bias on the world?
Zachary Vorhies has leaked 950+ pages of internal Google documents which prove Google has engaged in censorship, election tampering and more.
leaked by whistleblower, activist and Google employee Zachary Vorhies reveal black-and-white proof that the Big Tech giant is violating its mission statement, engaging in widespread censorship and tampering in US politics/elections. Vorhies, to whom you can listen in interviews with Project Veritas and InfoWars, has taken 950+ pages of internal Google documents and made them freely available on the website of Project Veritas. The docs contradict public statements by Google, including testimony under oath given to Congress by Google CEO Sundar Pichai, who tried to claim that Google’s algorithm was fair, unbiased and not rigged. The docs include a blacklist of alternative sites (many libertarian and conservative/right-wing, but also some non-partisan) which Google was intentionally downgrading, de-ranking and burying. Google does this in order to be an information gatekeeper in line with its own ideological bias – and also to enact perception control on the population, behalf on its MIC masters in the shadows.
Google Attempts to have Whistleblower Vorhies Checked for “Mental Health”
Zachary Vorhies was at Google for 8 years. He started as a junior engineer, got promoted twice, and ended up as a senior software engineer. He reveals how Google started changing everything in 2016 right after Trump was elected. Up until that point their algorithms were more unbiased, but after that, he states that the company made an intentional shift to use their power to shape public perception (ostensibly to ensure “another Trump” never got elected). Once Google discovered that Vorhies was the one leaking internal company documents, they called the police in San Francisco to get them to screen him with a mental health “wellness check.” This is outrageous intimidation and an example of the Corporatocracy using the power of the state against its opponents. Lawyers warned Vorhies that Google was about to destroy his life, so he went public to gain some degree of safety. Then, in his own words, he set up a dead man’s switch, whereby if he were to mysteriously die or be ‘suicided’, everything (all his data and docs) would be immediately released to the public. Vorhies has a lot of guts and moral rectitude; he walked away from what he states was an annual salary of $260,000.
What do the Leaked Google Documents Show?
Vorhies has arranged the documents into categories. So far, in the Everything file, there are 8 categories: Censorship, Election Tampering, Fake News, Hiring Practices, Leadership Training, Machine Learning Fairness, Partisanship and Psychological Research. In the interests of brevity, we will look at some of these sections (but not all) to see what these valuable internal docs tell us about Google’s intentions, practices and agenda. These docs expand upon some of the earlier videos released by Project Veritas when Vorhies was still an anonymous insider. In videos like this, Vorhies exposed how Google was using the pretext of machine learning and algorithmic fairness to decide what people see. In this case, fairness is a dog whistle or coded message that does not mean what you think. Google defines fairness as anything that “prejudicial treatment of people that is related to sensitive characteristics such as race, income, sexual orientation or gender …”. Facts be damned! Do we live in a post-fact, post truth-world as some have suggested? Some Google documents shockingly shows the length to which Google wants to mold perception by stating:
“For example, imagine that a Google image query for “CEOs” shows predominantly men … even if it were a factually accurate representation of the world, it would be algorithmic unfairness.”
“In some cases it may be appropriate to take no action … while in other cases it may be desirable to consider how we might help society reach a more fair and equitable state via product intervention.”
And what exactly is product intervention? It is Google acting as a gatekeeper, wanting to establish “a single point of truth” as they admit in their docs, which ties in to my article on Voice AI.
Google Documents: Censorship
The documents show that some self-described feminist Google employees started a petition to end Google’s AdSense relationship with Breitbart and to downrank InfoWars. It also shows that Google possessed a very lengthy blacklist entitled the YouTube Controversial Query Blacklist. Take a look at some of the terms included on this blacklist. The image below is just a single page out of 40!
Page 22 of the 40-page Google YouTube ‘Controversial Query Blacklist’
All sorts of terms made this list, especially those pertaining to false flag operations, which clearly shows the areas where the NWO controllers want to limit public perception. Here are the main overall terms from the blacklist:
- false flags
- crisis actors
- how to spot a crisis actor
- eyewitness actors
- vegas shooting hoax
- high school shooter
- steven paddock
- fake news about las vegas
- david hogg forgets lines
- florida hoax
- parkland false flag
Interestingly, there were also some terms relating to abortion that were blacklisted:
- abortion is wrong
- abortion is a crime
- rape crisis network
- murder of innocent babies
Google Documents: Fake News
One of the documents in this category is another blacklist, this time for news sites to be excluded, entitled “news black list site for google now.” The document’s purpose is stated at the top: “# Manual list of sites excluded from appearing as Google Now stories.” The document is long, containing a plethora or libertarian and conservative sites such as NaturalNews.com and InfoWars.com, as well as non-partisan freedom sites such as ActivistPost.com and DavidIcke.com.
Google Documents: Election Tampering
The 3 documents in this section revolve around the rather astonishing action by Google of removing a word from their English-Arabic dictionary for the sole purpose of making Republican President Donald Trump look bad! Trump used the Arabic term “cov fe’fe” in a tweet which means “I will stand up.” Google removed the word to make it seem as though Trump was speaking jibberish and that his tweet made no sense.
Google Documents: Partisanship
Some of the Google files leaked by Vorhies are screenshots of emails by Google employees who were lamenting the loss of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election, or who were expressing shock that “they did all they could” to encourage Latino voters and had no idea so many of them would vote for Trump. For example, check out the words in this image below:
“I have tried to stay objective, but … This is devastating for our Democratic Latino community. After all these efforts and what we thought was positive momentum towards change, the results are not what we expected at all … I will be taking the next few days off … I had planned a vacation and thought I would be taking the time to celebrate. Now it will be time to reflect on how to continue to support my community through these difficult times.”
The Google documents also contain this slide (right) with a Trump quote, making the assertion that they should try to do something about the bias of Trump. This is an admission of guilt already, in the sense that they are overstepping their mark as a neutral organizer of information in an attempt to becoming a gatekeeper of information. Reading through all these leaked docs, it is incredibly ironic to see all the emphasis Google places on diversity, inclusion and overcoming bias, when it is so bogged down by bias itself. Remember how they fired James Damore in 2017 for the crime of questioning Google’s policy on diversity and the fact that it denied certain biological traits and facts about men and women?
Google is not about eliminating bias; it’s about making the world conform to its own bias.
Consequently, there is no such thing as unbiased algorithm; algorithms inherently and inescapably reflect the prejudices, values and biases of those humans who created them.
Google Documents: Psychological Research
One of the documents in this section goes to great lengths to talk about algorithmic discrimination. Yet again, I find it highly ironic that Google is spending all this energy and effort in trying to be perfectly equal, inclusive and diverse, while blatantly discriminating against those with an open-mind pursuing truth and freedom (‘conspiracy theorists’).
“Algorithmic discrimination (AD) results when online processing of information leads to unequal
service to, or categorization of, individual segments of the population who should be treated in
the same manner. These inequalities might be based on race, gender, sexual identity, or some
other factor, visible or invisible.”
Diversity is cool, but only if it’s Google’s idea of diversity. If you question governmental lies, see through official narrative propaganda or think outside the box, Google will use its entire apparatus to de-rank, downgrade, bury, hide and obscure you. Welcome to the machine.
Platform or Publisher? Playing Both Sides of the Game for Profit and Power
For years Google has denied that it wants to sculpt the information landscape and to mold perception by lamely claiming that it is a neutral platform, the same defense used by other Big Tech giants. Now the black-and-white evidence is in which flatly contradicts all that. Google is clearly violating its own mission statement of “do no evil” (which they dropped) and “making information universally accessible” by censoring those they don’t like – which is the diametric opposite of accessible. Google is actually making information inaccessible!
Although there has been (rightly) a huge outcry about Google attacking libertarian and conservative viewpoints, this issue is ultimately non-partisan and beyond the fake left-right paradigm. Google will blatantly censor anyone it doesn’t agree with, not just on the right, but also on the left, as it showed with its recent flagrant example of using a technicality as a pretext to not run Tulsi Gabbard ads during a recent crucial period. People need to use this as a wakeup call to look beyond partisan politics and see that censorship serves no one. The US Republic was set up on the principle of free speech, and free speech by its very nature includes bad speech, unwelcome speech, uncomfortable speech, factually incorrect speech and hate speech.
The question for those in Congress is: what are you going to do about the Google behemoth? What are you waiting for? Why are you not revoking Google’s status under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and reclassifying it from a platform to a publisher?
I have already covered in previous articles how Google is much more than a simple search engine, email provider and ad network. It has chilling and far-reaching aims, such as directing human evolution itself. In the interviews linked above, Vorhies mentions how he believes the biggest threat is the Google-Facebook-Twitter alliance constructing an electronic echo chamber to showcase certain opinions and obscure others not conforming to Big Tech’s ideological bias. He also highlights that Google has moved its Deep Mind AI project (which he compares to the Manhattan Project) to China, revealing how Project Dragonfly was a fake AI project to cover up Deep Mind. Vorhies states that when Google was caught, they officially terminated Project Dragonfly project last month in July. Peter Thiel wrote an NYT article asking USG to investigate Google for treason over this. One thing is for sure: Google has become one of the chief enemies of truth and freedom in the world, and needs to be watched extremely closely.